Review



shnc cells  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress shnc cells
    Shnc Cells, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/shnc cells/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 96 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    shnc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    MedChemExpress shnc cells
    Shnc Cells, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/shnc cells/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    shnc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems shnc hepa1 6 cells
    Shnc Hepa1 6 Cells, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/shnc hepa1 6 cells/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    shnc hepa1 6 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    GemPharmatech Co Ltd shnc-evs derived from hgc-27 cells
    Shnc Evs Derived From Hgc 27 Cells, supplied by GemPharmatech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/shnc-evs derived from hgc-27 cells/product/GemPharmatech Co Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    shnc-evs derived from hgc-27 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    CEM Corporation cem-shnc cells
    The combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 disruption has a synergistic antileukemic effect in the T-ALL mice model. (A) Schematic representation of the human T-ALL CEM cell-xenograft mouse model (CEM xenograft). CEM (2 × 10 5 per mouse) were IV injected into NCG mice, and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group 1 (vehicle control); group 2 (CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group 3 (WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 every 2 days through intraperitoneal injection at 60 mg/kg for 25 days); and group 4 (CX-4945 and OICR-9429 combination treatment using the same doses as provided previously). (B) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug control of CEM-xenograft mouse models. The mice were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days. (C-D) Spleen images (C) and weights (D) of 4 groups of mice posttreatment. (E) The percentage of human CD45 + and CD7 + cells in the spleen and BM from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (F-G) Representative immunohistological images (F) and quantitation data (G) of human CD45 in the spleen from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (H) The protein level of WDR5 and <t>ATAD2</t> and the internal control of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. (I) mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗∗∗ P < .001. i.g., intragastic gavage; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; OI, OICR-9429.
    Cem Shnc Cells, supplied by CEM Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cem-shnc cells/product/CEM Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cem-shnc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    CEM Corporation cells with scramble shrna control (cem-shnc)
    Oncogenic role of <t>WDR5</t> through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.
    Cells With Scramble Shrna Control (Cem Shnc), supplied by CEM Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cells with scramble shrna control (cem-shnc)/product/CEM Corporation
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cells with scramble shrna control (cem-shnc) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Changsheng Bio Technology Co a2780-shnc cells
    Oncogenic role of <t>WDR5</t> through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.
    A2780 Shnc Cells, supplied by Changsheng Bio Technology Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/a2780-shnc cells/product/Changsheng Bio Technology Co
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    a2780-shnc cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Genechem cells of shnc and shtsc2 melanocytes
    Oncogenic role of <t>WDR5</t> through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.
    Cells Of Shnc And Shtsc2 Melanocytes, supplied by Genechem, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cells of shnc and shtsc2 melanocytes/product/Genechem
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cells of shnc and shtsc2 melanocytes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Servicebio Inc 5-8f cells expressing negative control shrna (shnc) and 5-8f cells with cenpn knockdown (sh cenpn)
    Oncogenic role of <t>WDR5</t> through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.
    5 8f Cells Expressing Negative Control Shrna (Shnc) And 5 8f Cells With Cenpn Knockdown (Sh Cenpn), supplied by Servicebio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/5-8f cells expressing negative control shrna (shnc) and 5-8f cells with cenpn knockdown (sh cenpn)/product/Servicebio Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    5-8f cells expressing negative control shrna (shnc) and 5-8f cells with cenpn knockdown (sh cenpn) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 disruption has a synergistic antileukemic effect in the T-ALL mice model. (A) Schematic representation of the human T-ALL CEM cell-xenograft mouse model (CEM xenograft). CEM (2 × 10 5 per mouse) were IV injected into NCG mice, and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group 1 (vehicle control); group 2 (CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group 3 (WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 every 2 days through intraperitoneal injection at 60 mg/kg for 25 days); and group 4 (CX-4945 and OICR-9429 combination treatment using the same doses as provided previously). (B) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug control of CEM-xenograft mouse models. The mice were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days. (C-D) Spleen images (C) and weights (D) of 4 groups of mice posttreatment. (E) The percentage of human CD45 + and CD7 + cells in the spleen and BM from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (F-G) Representative immunohistological images (F) and quantitation data (G) of human CD45 in the spleen from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (H) The protein level of WDR5 and ATAD2 and the internal control of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. (I) mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗∗∗ P < .001. i.g., intragastic gavage; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; OI, OICR-9429.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 disruption has a synergistic antileukemic effect in the T-ALL mice model. (A) Schematic representation of the human T-ALL CEM cell-xenograft mouse model (CEM xenograft). CEM (2 × 10 5 per mouse) were IV injected into NCG mice, and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group 1 (vehicle control); group 2 (CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group 3 (WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 every 2 days through intraperitoneal injection at 60 mg/kg for 25 days); and group 4 (CX-4945 and OICR-9429 combination treatment using the same doses as provided previously). (B) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug control of CEM-xenograft mouse models. The mice were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days. (C-D) Spleen images (C) and weights (D) of 4 groups of mice posttreatment. (E) The percentage of human CD45 + and CD7 + cells in the spleen and BM from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (F-G) Representative immunohistological images (F) and quantitation data (G) of human CD45 in the spleen from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (H) The protein level of WDR5 and ATAD2 and the internal control of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. (I) mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗∗∗ P < .001. i.g., intragastic gavage; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls.

    Techniques: Disruption, Injection, Control, Comparison, Quantitation Assay

    Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor in patient-derived T-ALL leukemia-xenograft (PDX) mouse model. (A) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug controls in 3 different PDX mouse models: PDX-P1 (Patient, [Pt.] T-ALL-P1 in <xref ref-type=supplemental Table 3 ), PDX-P2 (Pt. T-ALL-P2), and PDX-P3 (Pt. T-ALL-P3). (B) Comparison of percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells in the spleen of the mice in combo group vs either single drug controls. (C-E) Comparison of mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in combo group vs either single drug controls in the spleen of the mouse models. The mice in panels A-E were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days, and then, when the vehicle mice met the early removal criteria due to the excessive leukemia burden, the mice were euthanized and the single cells were isolated from the spleen for flow cytometry analysis; the mRNA of the cells was prepared for qPCR analysis. ∗∗∗ P < .001. OI, OICR-9429. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor in patient-derived T-ALL leukemia-xenograft (PDX) mouse model. (A) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug controls in 3 different PDX mouse models: PDX-P1 (Patient, [Pt.] T-ALL-P1 in supplemental Table 3 ), PDX-P2 (Pt. T-ALL-P2), and PDX-P3 (Pt. T-ALL-P3). (B) Comparison of percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells in the spleen of the mice in combo group vs either single drug controls. (C-E) Comparison of mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in combo group vs either single drug controls in the spleen of the mouse models. The mice in panels A-E were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days, and then, when the vehicle mice met the early removal criteria due to the excessive leukemia burden, the mice were euthanized and the single cells were isolated from the spleen for flow cytometry analysis; the mRNA of the cells was prepared for qPCR analysis. ∗∗∗ P < .001. OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls.

    Techniques: Drug discovery, Derivative Assay, Comparison, Isolation, Flow Cytometry

    Identifying ATAD2 as the downstream target on CX-4945–mediated transcriptional repression of WDR5 in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of WDR5 KD on ATAD2 expression in mRNA level (A) and protein level (B) of CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C) Overlapping DEGs from the RNA-seq data in CEM cells treated with CX-4945 or WDR5 inhibitor. (D) Heat map of the top overlapped DEGs in the 2 RNA-seq analyses. (E-F) Effect of combination of CX-4945 (CX) and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 (OI) on the expression of ATAD2 compared with a single drug in mRNA level (E) and protein level (F) in CEM cells. (G) Effect of WDR5 on the activity of the ATAD2 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD on the H3K4me3 enrichment in the promoter region of ATAD2 in CEM cells by qChIP assay. (I-J) Effect of CX-4945 on WDR5 binding and H3K4me3 enrichment at the ATAD2 promoter in CEM cells by qChIP assay. Panels H-J are representative of 3 qChIP assays. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. IgG, immunoglobulin G; OI, OICR-9429.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identifying ATAD2 as the downstream target on CX-4945–mediated transcriptional repression of WDR5 in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of WDR5 KD on ATAD2 expression in mRNA level (A) and protein level (B) of CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C) Overlapping DEGs from the RNA-seq data in CEM cells treated with CX-4945 or WDR5 inhibitor. (D) Heat map of the top overlapped DEGs in the 2 RNA-seq analyses. (E-F) Effect of combination of CX-4945 (CX) and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 (OI) on the expression of ATAD2 compared with a single drug in mRNA level (E) and protein level (F) in CEM cells. (G) Effect of WDR5 on the activity of the ATAD2 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD on the H3K4me3 enrichment in the promoter region of ATAD2 in CEM cells by qChIP assay. (I-J) Effect of CX-4945 on WDR5 binding and H3K4me3 enrichment at the ATAD2 promoter in CEM cells by qChIP assay. Panels H-J are representative of 3 qChIP assays. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. IgG, immunoglobulin G; OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls.

    Techniques: Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Activity Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Binding Assay

    Oncogenic roles of ATAD2 by regulating cell cycle progression in T-ALL. (A) The efficiency of ATAD2 KD by shRNA (sh ATAD2 ) vs scramble shRNA control (shNC) in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells by western blot. (B) Effect of ATAD2 KD vs shNC on cell proliferation in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C-D) Effect of ATAD2 KD vs shNC on cell cycle progression in CEM cells (C, representative images; D, bar graph). (E-F) Effect of ATAD2 silence by shRNA vs shNC on Kaplan-Meier survival curves (E), and percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells (F) in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model. The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls. The mRNA levels were determined by qPCR assay. (H) Association of ATAD2 expression with relapse in our cohort. (I) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA levels in 5 pairs of T-ALL newly diagnosed samples vs relapsed ones. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Oncogenic roles of ATAD2 by regulating cell cycle progression in T-ALL. (A) The efficiency of ATAD2 KD by shRNA (sh ATAD2 ) vs scramble shRNA control (shNC) in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells by western blot. (B) Effect of ATAD2 KD vs shNC on cell proliferation in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C-D) Effect of ATAD2 KD vs shNC on cell cycle progression in CEM cells (C, representative images; D, bar graph). (E-F) Effect of ATAD2 silence by shRNA vs shNC on Kaplan-Meier survival curves (E), and percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells (F) in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model. The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls. The mRNA levels were determined by qPCR assay. (H) Association of ATAD2 expression with relapse in our cohort. (I) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA levels in 5 pairs of T-ALL newly diagnosed samples vs relapsed ones. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001.

    Article Snippet: The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh ATAD2 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (G) Comparison of ATAD2 mRNA level in our T-ALL cohorts vs normal BM controls.

    Techniques: shRNA, Control, Western Blot, Injection, Comparison, Expressing

    Oncogenic role of WDR5 through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Oncogenic role of WDR5 through cell cycle regulation in T-ALL. (A) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in T-ALL cohort vs normal BM controls. (B-E) Association of WDR5 expression with WBC (B), BM blasts (C), survival (D), and relapse (E). The cohort was divided into WDR5 high and WDR5 low groups based on the median value of WDR5 mRNA level as the cutoff value. (F) The association of WDR5 expression with risk stratification in the T-ALL cohort. (G) Comparison of WDR5 mRNA level in 5 paired samples of newly diagnosed vs the relapsed ones. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD by shRNA on its protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (I-J) Effect of WDR5 KD on cell cycle progress in CEM cells (I, representative images; J, bar graph). (K-L) Effect of WDR5 silence by shRNA on spleen weights (K) and percentage of human CD45 + cells in the spleen and BM of the xenograft mouse model (L). The mice were IV injected with the CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells, respectively, for 28 days, and the single cells were prepared and analyzed. (M) Quantitation data of immunohistological images for human CD45 + cells in the spleen from CEM-shNC and CEM-sh WDR5 mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; WBC, white blood cell.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Comparison, Expressing, shRNA, Injection, Quantitation Assay

    IKAROS represses WDR5 transcription in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of IKZF1 KD on WDR5 expression in mRNA level by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR; A) and protein level in CEM and MOLT4 cells (B). (C) Effect of IKZF1 overexpression on WDR5 protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (D) Effect of IKAROS on the activity of the WDR5 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (E) Effect of CX-4945 on IKAROS binding at the WDR5 promoter as measured by quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (qChIP) in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (F) The effect of IKZF1 KD on CX-4945–induced WDR5 expression change in mRNA level by qPCR in CEM (upper) and MOLT4 (lower) cells. (G) Schematic representation of the xenograft mice model. CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells were IV injected into NCG mice and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group CEM-shNC plus vehicle (receive vehicle daily through gavage for 25 days); group CEM-shNC plus CX-4945 (receive CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group CEM-sh WDR5 plus vehicle (receive vehicle daily through gavage for 25 days); and group CEM-sh WDR5 plus CX-4945 (receive CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days). (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 4 groups of mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IKAROS represses WDR5 transcription in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of IKZF1 KD on WDR5 expression in mRNA level by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR; A) and protein level in CEM and MOLT4 cells (B). (C) Effect of IKZF1 overexpression on WDR5 protein level in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (D) Effect of IKAROS on the activity of the WDR5 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (E) Effect of CX-4945 on IKAROS binding at the WDR5 promoter as measured by quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (qChIP) in CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (F) The effect of IKZF1 KD on CX-4945–induced WDR5 expression change in mRNA level by qPCR in CEM (upper) and MOLT4 (lower) cells. (G) Schematic representation of the xenograft mice model. CEM-shNC or CEM-sh WDR5 cells were IV injected into NCG mice and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group CEM-shNC plus vehicle (receive vehicle daily through gavage for 25 days); group CEM-shNC plus CX-4945 (receive CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group CEM-sh WDR5 plus vehicle (receive vehicle daily through gavage for 25 days); and group CEM-sh WDR5 plus CX-4945 (receive CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days). (H) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of 4 groups of mice. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Expressing, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Over Expression, Activity Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Binding Assay, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation, Injection

    Synergistic effect of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor on arresting cell proliferation and cell cycle in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs single drug on cell proliferation in CEM (A) and MOLT4 cells (B). (C-F) Synergistic analysis of the 2 inhibitors on proliferation arrest in CEM (C-D) and MOLT4 cells (E-F) with combination index (C,E) and Bliss models (D,F). Cells were treated with the indicated doses of drugs for 72 hours. (G-J) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs single drug controls on cell cycle arrest in CEM (G, representative images; H, bar graph) and MOLT4 (I, representative images; J, bar graph) cells. Cells were treated with indicated doses of the drugs for 72 hours. (K-N) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs the single drug control on mRNA levels of CCNE2 (K,M) and CDK2 (L,N) in CEM and MOLT4 cells. The cells were treated with indicated doses of the drugs for 72 hours, and the mRNA levels were quantitated with qPCR. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; OI, OICR-9429.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Synergistic effect of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor on arresting cell proliferation and cell cycle in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs single drug on cell proliferation in CEM (A) and MOLT4 cells (B). (C-F) Synergistic analysis of the 2 inhibitors on proliferation arrest in CEM (C-D) and MOLT4 cells (E-F) with combination index (C,E) and Bliss models (D,F). Cells were treated with the indicated doses of drugs for 72 hours. (G-J) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs single drug controls on cell cycle arrest in CEM (G, representative images; H, bar graph) and MOLT4 (I, representative images; J, bar graph) cells. Cells were treated with indicated doses of the drugs for 72 hours. (K-N) Effect of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor vs the single drug control on mRNA levels of CCNE2 (K,M) and CDK2 (L,N) in CEM and MOLT4 cells. The cells were treated with indicated doses of the drugs for 72 hours, and the mRNA levels were quantitated with qPCR. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. PI, propidium iodine; OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Control

    The combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 disruption has a synergistic antileukemic effect in the T-ALL mice model. (A) Schematic representation of the human T-ALL CEM cell-xenograft mouse model (CEM xenograft). CEM (2 × 10 5 per mouse) were IV injected into NCG mice, and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group 1 (vehicle control); group 2 (CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group 3 (WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 every 2 days through intraperitoneal injection at 60 mg/kg for 25 days); and group 4 (CX-4945 and OICR-9429 combination treatment using the same doses as provided previously). (B) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug control of CEM-xenograft mouse models. The mice were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days. (C-D) Spleen images (C) and weights (D) of 4 groups of mice posttreatment. (E) The percentage of human CD45 + and CD7 + cells in the spleen and BM from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (F-G) Representative immunohistological images (F) and quantitation data (G) of human CD45 in the spleen from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (H) The protein level of WDR5 and ATAD2 and the internal control of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. (I) mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗∗∗ P < .001. i.g., intragastic gavage; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; OI, OICR-9429.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 disruption has a synergistic antileukemic effect in the T-ALL mice model. (A) Schematic representation of the human T-ALL CEM cell-xenograft mouse model (CEM xenograft). CEM (2 × 10 5 per mouse) were IV injected into NCG mice, and the following 4 groups of mice were established: group 1 (vehicle control); group 2 (CX-4945 daily through gavage at 100 mg/kg for 25 days); group 3 (WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 every 2 days through intraperitoneal injection at 60 mg/kg for 25 days); and group 4 (CX-4945 and OICR-9429 combination treatment using the same doses as provided previously). (B) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug control of CEM-xenograft mouse models. The mice were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days. (C-D) Spleen images (C) and weights (D) of 4 groups of mice posttreatment. (E) The percentage of human CD45 + and CD7 + cells in the spleen and BM from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (F-G) Representative immunohistological images (F) and quantitation data (G) of human CD45 in the spleen from 4 groups of mice post-treatment. (H) The protein level of WDR5 and ATAD2 and the internal control of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. (I) mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in the spleen tissues of the mice after the treatment. Scale bar, 50 μm. ∗∗∗ P < .001. i.g., intragastic gavage; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Disruption, Injection, Control, Comparison, Quantitation Assay

    Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor in patient-derived T-ALL leukemia-xenograft (PDX) mouse model. (A) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug controls in 3 different PDX mouse models: PDX-P1 (Patient, [Pt.] T-ALL-P1 in <xref ref-type=supplemental Table 3 ), PDX-P2 (Pt. T-ALL-P2), and PDX-P3 (Pt. T-ALL-P3). (B) Comparison of percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells in the spleen of the mice in combo group vs either single drug controls. (C-E) Comparison of mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in combo group vs either single drug controls in the spleen of the mouse models. The mice in panels A-E were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days, and then, when the vehicle mice met the early removal criteria due to the excessive leukemia burden, the mice were euthanized and the single cells were isolated from the spleen for flow cytometry analysis; the mRNA of the cells was prepared for qPCR analysis. ∗∗∗ P < .001. OI, OICR-9429. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor in patient-derived T-ALL leukemia-xenograft (PDX) mouse model. (A) Comparison of Kaplan-Meier survival curves in the combination of CX-4945 and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 compared with either single drug controls in 3 different PDX mouse models: PDX-P1 (Patient, [Pt.] T-ALL-P1 in supplemental Table 3 ), PDX-P2 (Pt. T-ALL-P2), and PDX-P3 (Pt. T-ALL-P3). (B) Comparison of percentage of human CD45 + CD7 + cells in the spleen of the mice in combo group vs either single drug controls. (C-E) Comparison of mRNA level of WDR5 , ATAD2 , CCNE2 , and CDK2 in combo group vs either single drug controls in the spleen of the mouse models. The mice in panels A-E were treated with the indicated drugs for 25 days, and then, when the vehicle mice met the early removal criteria due to the excessive leukemia burden, the mice were euthanized and the single cells were isolated from the spleen for flow cytometry analysis; the mRNA of the cells was prepared for qPCR analysis. ∗∗∗ P < .001. OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Drug discovery, Derivative Assay, Comparison, Isolation, Flow Cytometry

    Identifying ATAD2 as the downstream target on CX-4945–mediated transcriptional repression of WDR5 in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of WDR5 KD on ATAD2 expression in mRNA level (A) and protein level (B) of CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C) Overlapping DEGs from the RNA-seq data in CEM cells treated with CX-4945 or WDR5 inhibitor. (D) Heat map of the top overlapped DEGs in the 2 RNA-seq analyses. (E-F) Effect of combination of CX-4945 (CX) and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 (OI) on the expression of ATAD2 compared with a single drug in mRNA level (E) and protein level (F) in CEM cells. (G) Effect of WDR5 on the activity of the ATAD2 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD on the H3K4me3 enrichment in the promoter region of ATAD2 in CEM cells by qChIP assay. (I-J) Effect of CX-4945 on WDR5 binding and H3K4me3 enrichment at the ATAD2 promoter in CEM cells by qChIP assay. Panels H-J are representative of 3 qChIP assays. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. IgG, immunoglobulin G; OI, OICR-9429.

    Journal: Blood

    Article Title: Targeting WDR5/ATAD2 signaling by the CK2/IKAROS axis demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in T-ALL

    doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024130

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identifying ATAD2 as the downstream target on CX-4945–mediated transcriptional repression of WDR5 in T-ALL. (A-B) Effect of WDR5 KD on ATAD2 expression in mRNA level (A) and protein level (B) of CEM (left) and MOLT4 (right) cells. (C) Overlapping DEGs from the RNA-seq data in CEM cells treated with CX-4945 or WDR5 inhibitor. (D) Heat map of the top overlapped DEGs in the 2 RNA-seq analyses. (E-F) Effect of combination of CX-4945 (CX) and WDR5 inhibitor OICR-9429 (OI) on the expression of ATAD2 compared with a single drug in mRNA level (E) and protein level (F) in CEM cells. (G) Effect of WDR5 on the activity of the ATAD2 promoter assessed by luciferase reporter assay in 293T cells. (H) Effect of WDR5 KD on the H3K4me3 enrichment in the promoter region of ATAD2 in CEM cells by qChIP assay. (I-J) Effect of CX-4945 on WDR5 binding and H3K4me3 enrichment at the ATAD2 promoter in CEM cells by qChIP assay. Panels H-J are representative of 3 qChIP assays. ∗ P < .05; ∗∗ P < .01; ∗∗∗ P < .001. IgG, immunoglobulin G; OI, OICR-9429.

    Article Snippet: Then, CEM cells with WDR5 stable KD (CEM-sh WDR5 ) and scramble shRNA control (CEM-shNC) were IV injected into NCG mice, respectively.

    Techniques: Expressing, RNA Sequencing, Activity Assay, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Binding Assay